22–23 Jul 2026
Heidelberg Congress Center
Europe/Berlin timezone

Effect of a Personalized Perioperative Exercise Program on Physical Function, Fatigue, and Quality of Life in Lung Cancer Surgery: Results of the PEP Phase III Randomized Trial

22 Jul 2026, 11:00
15m
Heidelberg Congress Center ( Heidelberg Congress Center )

Heidelberg Congress Center

Heidelberg Congress Center

Czernyring 20 69115 Heidelberg Germany
3 - Talk Oral Session

Speaker

Caroline Himbert (Huntsman Cancer Institute)

Description

Background: Exercise interventions benefit surgical lung cancer patients, but many are resource intensive and follow a one-size-fits-all design. The Precision-Exercise-Prescription (PEP) trial is a clinic-aligned, personalized perioperative exercise program with remote monitoring that previously showed improved physical function in women and reduced fatigue across groups at 2 months post-surgery. This longitudinal analysis evaluates effects of the PEP program on physical function, fatigue, and quality of life at 6 months post-surgery.

Methods: The PEP Study enrolled adults with primary (stages I–IIIa) or oligometastatic lung cancer undergoing surgery. Participants were randomized to the PEP exercise intervention or standard care between November 2017 and 2021, with follow-up through November 2022. The personalized intervention, tailored to Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AMPAC) mobility scores, was prescribed and remotely monitored by a physical therapist starting approximately two weeks before surgery and continuing postoperatively. Standard care consisted of spirometer use and general exercise encouragement without a structured program. Physical function (6-minute walk test), fatigue (FACIT-F), and overall quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Lung) were assessed at baseline and 6 months, and within- and between-group changes were analyzed.

Results: A total of 182 patients (exercise: n=92; standard care: n=90) were included. Patients in the exercise group showed a modest, non-significant increase in 6MW distance from baseline to 6 months (467±12m to 476±19m, p=0.51), whereas the standard care group demonstrated a marginally significant decline (481±11m to 450±20m, p=0.06). However, the between-group difference in change was not statistically significant (p=0.09). No significant differences in changes in fatigue or overall quality of life were observed from baseline to 6 months (p>0.05).

Conclusions: The PEP exercise program yielded modest within-group improvements in physical function from baseline to 6 months post-surgery, but did not produce significant between-group benefits compared with standard care for fatigue and quality of life.

Keywords

Exercise oncology, physical function, quality of life, lung cancer

Abstract submitters declaration yes
Conflict of Interest & Ethical Approval yes

Author

Caroline Himbert (Huntsman Cancer Institute)

Co-authors

Victoria Bandera (University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute) Andy Yanagihara (Huntsman Cancer Institute) Christopher Barnes (University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute) Bailee Daniels (Huntsman Cancer Institute) Kenneth Boucher (University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute) Yuxin Zhao (Huntsman Cancer Institute) Brian Mitzman (University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute) David Wetter (University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute) Rachel Hess (University of Utah) Jaewhan Kim (University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute) Kelly Lundberg (University of Utah) Jennifer Ligibel (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School) Robin Marcus (University of Utah) Samuel Finlayson (Huntsman Cancer Institute) Paul LaStayo (University of Utah) Thomas Varghese Jr (University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute) Cornelia Ulrich (University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.